Medical pros and cons?

Medical pros and cons?

He juggled, flogged, scolded patients severely, and deliberately deceived friends and supervisors; for personal purposes, he misrepresented hospital rules and even laws; he was addicted to alcohol and obtained pain medications illegally.

It was also him who made the hit American drama Doctor House.

  The protagonist of the Fox medical drama “Doctor House” is Gregory the weird-tempered?

Dr. House.

He has no sympathy and affection for patients, and has no regard for medical ethics.

(One proof is that there is an audio clip on the show’s website.

The remarks are particularly offensive, and Dr. House wrote: “Is it still illegal to dissect a living person?

“) However, no matter how arrogant and rude, and no professional ethics, he has become popular all over the world, and those who are going to engage in the medical industry have also become favored.

  In 2008, a survey by the Johns Hopkins University’s Berman Institute of Biological Sciences showed that 65% of nursing students and 76% of medical students had watched “Doctor House”.

According to the results of this survey, data published in the American Journal of Biomedicine showed that ABC’s medical drama Grey’s Anatomy, although not involving too much professional medical knowledge, won 80% of nursing students and 73% Of medical students.

The story of Grey’s Anatomy, which took place in a fictional Grace Hospital in Seattle, followed by a series of sexual, romantic, and medical dramas that fascinated them.

  For most viewers, especially those who have received medical professional training, the scenes in the play are only slightly similar to the real medical environment.

In fact, in the 2008 survey, both nursing and medical students stipulated that they had not learned medical lessons from such TV series.

However, the organizers of these surveys doubted that watching such medical dramas could have a slight impact on their clinical care, whether doctors or patients.

  To find out, they uniformly tracked the nature and frequency of medical misconduct and violations of medical clinical behavior in two episodes of “Dr. House” and “Grey’s Anatomy”.

The most straightforward interpretation of the results published in the April issue of “Medical Science Research” is, thank goodness!

Dr. House and Dr. McDreamy, fortunately, only practice in TV series.

  From the autumn of 2005 to the spring of the following year, in a total of 50 episodes of “Dr. House” and “Grey’s Anatomy”, the researchers intercepted a total of 179 pictures involving clinical diseases.

Of these, 49 were related to patients signing informed consent.

In about 43% of the pictures, the characters in the play adhere to the medical conventions, but in 57% of the pictures, the characters’ performance in the play is completely inappropriate.

For example, an informed consent was not obtained for a particular treatment, or a public deceit was made for the patient’s signature (both cases are more common in Dr. House).

  In addition, a total of 22 emergencies were caused by doctors in the drama violating medical practices, closing patients to unnecessary risks or ignoring clinical treatment of patients.

In an episode of Grey’s Anatomy, is Doctor Isowell?

Stevens intentionally worsened the patient’s blood pressure (ha!

The patient is still her boyfriend), hoping to be on the heart transplant waiting list, ranking higher.

  In addition, investigators described the professional behavior of doctors in the two plays.

Not surprisingly, there are few standardized medical practices.

Of the 396 scenarios involving peer-to-peer dialogue, only 5% matched those in real hospitals.

In the dialogue between doctors and patients, less than 1/3 of the actual hospital can match.

In addition, the researchers also found that the role of sexual misconduct frequently in the play, compared with reality, this “completely contrary to the profession.”

  The question is, will the various advanced equipment in the play have a more impact on the audience in reality?

A review of previous surveys reveals that this question is not difficult to answer.

After a 2007 investigation into American dramas, a proper term emerged, namely “CSIeffect”
.

Earliest, the media broadcast the latest scientific progress; at the same time, the media will “fabricate” technology, see TV series such as “CSI Crime Scene Investigation”.

In other words, the public is becoming more and more familiar with the progress of science and technology and knows the importance of scientific evidence.

The jury now relies more on forensic evidence.

An investigation of more than a thousand jury members has shown that they are more willing to vote innocent if medical evidence is not available.

In 2009, a survey by the National Academy of Sciences showed that the “crime scene effect” contributed to the formation of misconceptions. Even judges and lawyers believed that forensic evidence was foolproof and indisputable.   What about the medical field?

Previous research has shown that TV series can sometimes replace educational roles.

A survey in 2007 showed that the medical drama “Emergency Room Story”, which aired in 1994, has improved public health knowledge.

A survey by the University of Southern California showed that in the “Emergency Room Story”, there was a focus on a young girl diagnosed with high blood pressure who was prescribed to eat more fruits and vegetables-the audience was educated in a subtle way.

Surveys have shown that viewers of The Story of the Emergency Room have reported that their intervention habits are healthier and that they have a better understanding of hypertension and overweight.

  In terms of obtaining health information, viewers often prefer to be educated in the plot rather than directly preaching.

In January this year, research published in the Journal of Interpersonal Studies showed that women who had watched TV shows containing teenage pregnancy footage in college years, compared with women who only obtained such news in news reports, adopted standard birth control measures for two weeks.Later, they are more willing to participate in the investigation report.

However, in a study published in the journal Medical Physics, one of the authors, Ruth at the Berman Institute of Biomedicine?

Feyden’s novel: Available evidence suggests that there is no such thing as the “House effect.”

She cited a study in the European Journal of Emergency Medicine in 2002. The research content is a fictional medical scenario, which will cause people to have undue expectations for real medical care.

Researchers conducted a series of surveys on 820 young people, focusing on television viewing habits, understanding of CPR knowledge, and expectations for the success rate of CPR patients in hospitals.

The results show that watching with young people who have not watched medical episodes, viewers watching such TVs are more likely to overestimate the survival rate of patients with CPR in hospitals.

  In a real medical environment, when it comes to medical school problems, the problems are often very difficult.

As a result, viewers of Grey’s Anatomy may find that in the fictional Seattle Grace Hospital, doctors are both rash and unprofessional.

Mr. Feyden, the audience may also think that “physicians and nurses in reality, just like on television, are rude and frivolous, yet indifferent.”

As a fan of “Doctor House”, Feiden acknowledged that “as a general audience, I think most viewers think that there must not be so many Doctors in the hospital.

According to Feiden, some popular medical dramas will have people talking about medical physics-even more complicated topics, such as hospice care and use of medical resources-after a meal.

Feiden said, “This is a major double that we must face.

“In fact, in order to encourage the public to participate in such topics, she has co-named with her peers, hoping that the film and television industry will cooperate with medical physicists when shooting medical stories.

“As a biomedical scientist, I see possibilities.

“Her novel,” every year, there are more than 20 episodes of medical physics on television?
25 places.

These have attracted tens of millions of viewers worldwide.

In other words, the possibilities for getting the public’s attention to such issues are numerous.